Hookah (a.k.a. sheesha, waterpipe, nargila, argeela) has become very popular amongst college students nowadays.  Nevertheless, very little of the harms are known to its users.  It is often quite misunderstood as being harmless and not-addicting.  However, scientific research has proven otherwise as it is clearly established that hookah causes cancer and is, in fact, more harmful to one’s health than cigarettes.  Just this week, the WHO (World Health Organization) published a seven-page report claiming that hookah is just as hazardous to one’s health if not more hazardous than smoking cigarettes.

Hookah, in fact, actually does contain nicotine and one sitting of hookah is more hazardous to one’s cardiovascular system than cigarettes.  Cardiovascular disease is a serious threat to hookah smokers.  The carbon monoxide (CO) intake is also at a dangerous level when smoking hookah as it holds negative effects for those even exposed to second-hand smoke.  Second-hand smoke of hookah contains nicotine (which has shown to show addiction even through second-hand smoke), TAR, and even worse, heavy metals such as cobalt, arsenic, and lead!  These metals destroy a person’s body!  These findings were published in a scientific journal that was peer-reviewed and can be found on PubMed!

Hookah has shown to cause serious diseases.  Accepted scientific studies show that hookah causes an increase in the frequency of chromosomal abberations and sister chromatids.  This implies that the chance of our children having mutations is increased many-fold.  This is true for the man as well as the woman since a child receives twenty-three chromosomes from each parent. Therefore, this one fact alone should scare us from even being exposed to second-hand smoke of hookah and risking the health of our children!

In rats, hookah has shown an increase in hyperkeratosis and degeneration.  Moreover, a study in the Journal of Periodontology found that gum disease is five times more likely to occur with hookah smokers.  Other scientifically accepted journals have shown than hookah is linked with atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, decreased pulmonary function, various other cardiovascular diseases, TUBERCULOSIS, eczema, aspergillosis (through contamination), and postextraction alveolitis (of the teeth).

On top of all the above, hookah also causes cancer!  In a recent study, eighty-eight percent of those people with cancer in India were at one-time hookah smokers.  The risk for lung cancer is significantly increased with hookah.  A study in Pediatrics concluded that hookah is at-least the same, if not worse for one’s health, cancer-wise, than cigarettes.  Professor Thomas Eissenberg of Virginia Commonwealth University concluded through his studies on hookah that “every risk of cigarette smoking is also associated with water pipes (hookah).” 

Therefore, let us stay away from hookah.  There are no benefits from it whatsoever.  Let us stay away from it for the sake of our children and our health.  May Allah (SWT) guide us all.  Ameen.

14 Responses to “Hookah Causes Way More Than Cancer!”

  1. samreen Says:

    hey i really liked watever s written here regarding hookah….i was going 2 try it under friends influence but now dat i kno its consequences i will avoid it….thanx

  2. sayid Says:

    thanx alot for the infor about hooka mashallah.. im really a hooka addicted and i have difficulty on breathing im pretty sure its the hook. is there anyway i can avoid it cause basically all my friends smoke it.salam

    • fred johnson Says:

      sounds like asthma see a doctor, there is no way to avoid it as all your friends smoke it you will have to also, if your friends decide to walk off a cliff you will have to follow

  3. hussein Says:

    jazak ALAH khare for these valuable information

  4. Burraq Says:

    This is all great but you have not cited any links to where all this came from. We have all heard this in the past that it is bad for your health and even worse than cigarettes but there hasn;t been any concrete evidence to support it.
    I would like to see some details as to where this came from and proof around these studies.
    Several of my friends smoke sheesha and I myself have tried it several times.
    Big B

  5. Ramijul Says:

    thanks a lot for all this info. i really love hookah but now that i know how much harm it does i will stop to my best
    thank you again

  6. Ramijul Says:

    many Allah guide us to right path

  7. Bobby Says:

    You really need to cite your sources, because some of your information is misleading, or outright incorrect. Here is the abstract of an official study conducted on hookah smoking

    Hookah smoking and cancer: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in exclusive/ever hookah smokers
    http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/5/1/19
    Abstract

    Background

    We have recently published some work on CEA levels in hookah (also called narghile, shisha elsewhere) and cigarette smokers. Hookah smokers had higher levels of CEA than non-smokers although mean levels were low compared to cigarette smokers. However some of them were also users of other tobacco products (cigarettes, bidis, etc.).
    Objectives

    To find serum CEA levels in ever/exclusive hookah smokers, i.e. those who smoked only hookah (no cigarettes, bidis, etc.), prepared between 1 and 4 times a day with a quantity of up to 120 g of a tobacco-molasses mixture each (i.e. the tobacco weight equivalent of up to 60 cigarettes of 1 g each) and consumed in 1 to 8 sessions.
    Methods

    Enhanced chemiluminescent immunometric technique was applied to measure CEA levels in serum samples from 59 exclusive male smokers with age ranging from 20–80 years (mean = 58.8 ± 14.7 years) and 8–65 years of smoking (mean = 37.7 ± 16.8). 36 non-smokers served as controls. Subjects were divided into 3 groups according to the number of preparations; the number of sessions and the total daily smoking time: Light (1; 1; ≤ 20 minutes); Medium (1–3; 1–3; >20 min to ≤ 2 hrs) and Heavy smokers (2–4; 3–8; >2 hrs to ≤ 6 hrs). Because of the nature of distribution of CEA levels among our individuals, Wilcoxon’s rank sum two-sample test was applied to compare the variables.
    Results

    The overall CEA levels in exclusive hookah smokers (mean: 3.58 ± 2.61 ng/ml; n = 59) were not significantly different (p ≤ 0.0937) from the levels in non-smokers (2.35 ± 0.71 ng/ml). Mean levels in light, medium and heavy smokers were: 1.06 ± 0.492 ng/ml (n = 5); 2.52 ± 1.15 ng/ml (n = 28) and 5.11 ± 3.08 ng/ml (n = 26) respectively. The levels in medium smokers and non-smokers were also not significantly different (p ≤ 0.9138). In heavy smokers, the CEA levels were significantly higher than in non-smokers (p ≤ 0.0001567).
    Conclusion

    Overall CEA levels in exclusive hookah smokers were low compared to cigarette smokers. However, heavy hookah smoking substantially raises CEA levels. Low-nitrosamines smokeless tobacco of the SNUS Swedish type could be envisaged as an alternative to smoking for this category of users and also, in a broad harm reduction perspective, to the prevalent low-quality moist snuff called naswar.

  8. pat Says:

    hey yeah about this…, Iv read up on side effects of hooka, doctors havnt rlly researched much on this. A definite answer would be great. Sources and research proof would also go great with your statement. I am rather confused tho, is it good for you? Is it bad for you? or does it not do anything to you but relax you?? and does it cause cancer? research provided would be great. And this guy who made this page, where are your sources, are you just restating cigarette/tobacco smoking effects. thanks


  9. Hi Pat,

    You can find/search the evidence-based research data available at http://www.pubmed.com, an authentic scientific research database.

    -CGM

  10. Kyle Says:

    Thanks for the information!! :D


  11. I don’t agree what you are saying.Some flavors of tobacco doesn’t give any causes to the people..

  12. chirag patel Says:

    thanks i was going to have a hooka but because of this note i m really going to aviod it


Leave a Reply